Mobile Retail - Coming to any Store near You

February 17th, 2009

Forrester’s Sucharita Mulpuru (@smulpuru) has a new research report out with interesting findings about emerging trends in mobile and multi-channel retail. Overall, the report confirms that the mobile web is on the cusp of becoming a game-changer for both web and brick-and-mortar retailers. Smartphone users are becoming as likely to make an online purchase on the go as they are to use their smartphones in the context of a brick-and-mortar purchase.

Consumers Use Mobile Phones For Multichannel Retail according to Forrester

Competition is moving inside stores. A case in point is the Amazon App - an amazing iPhone app that enables users to take pictures of products they like to see if they could find them through Amazon and add them to their wishlist. With this app, Amazon will not only capture demand from consumers’ casual encounters with products they like, but also prey on shopping malls and department stores.

Price arbitrage is becoming much easier. Applications like ShopSavvy enables users to scan product bar codes to compare prices online and in nearby stores. Even without these apps, customers use their smartphones to make online purchases with in-store delivery if they find it more advantageous, only heightening cannibalizing within the same franchise.

Product and service information is becoming more accessible and more transparent. Two popular examples show that retailers’ traditional information advantage is further eroded, with relevant information being delivered in the hands of consumers while they shop. The GoodGuide iPhone app, for instance, delivers ratings about green, healthy and organic products right to your pocket and while you shop. The Yelp iPhone app delivers location-based user reviews and pictures of shops and services.

The advent of the mobile web ushers new challenges and opportunities for retailers. Empowering their sales force with loyalty program offerings and/or some form of price-matching latitude could help retailers tactically meet these challenges in the short run. Retailers should also consider the upside in mobile interactions, from delivering personalized, social or value-added information to sending location-based time-bound coupons to mobile users.

[Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Competing with Amazon in a Depressed Environment

February 1st, 2009

deathstarAmazon’s results this week were in sharp contrast with the overall health of the retail sector. As highlighted during the holiday seasons, Amazon ruthlessly grabbed market share in an overall down retail market and turned a respectable profit on its very solid execution.

Amazon’s success builds on

- a strong brand that keeps customer acquisition costs low;

- aggressive pricing that kept the brand at the forefront of many shopping comparison engines; and

- an experience that nurtures superior customer loyalty throughout the entire shopping cycle, from personalized recommendations to customer reviews.

Amazon’s success puts increased pressure on competitors to step up, at a time when most online retailers are in survival rather than investment mode.  Retailers actively should be looking at three crucial areas to grow their top line in this adverse environment.


Build an online shopping experience that fosters discovery

zapposRetailers have to better capture consumers mind before they have actually made their mind on a particular product. Google delivers very precise results when users search for an exact product – bringing competitors one click away from each others, with price becoming the only differentiator. Google is however inefficient at helping users shop a product category, such as a camera or clothes.

Retailers have to rethink how they can leverage their expertise to build a strong funnel from discovery to conversion. Zappos has just released a new way of exploring their catalog that enables customers to intuitively compare and explore shoes and accessories based on colors and shape. Distilled Clothing showcases its collection with an arresting use of videos that keeps the viewer engaged and wanting more.


Expand your reach online and offline

distilledBestBuy has been experimenting for quite some time to expand its reach online and offline. Last year, it started supporting microformats on its website to help build a critical mass of products to tag with Giftag – their social wishlist browser plugin and service. Giftag follows Amazon’s path of helping users share their wish list of products they want to buy, while keeping its finger on the pulse of consumer trends.

With mobile internet becoming pervasive, offline and online shopping are converging. Users are increasingly using their mobile devices to arbitrage between online and offline channels. Multi-channel retailers should however seize on this opportunity to compete with Amazon. Remix – BestBuy’s combined API and affiliate program – does just that. It enables developers to build applications on top of both product catalog, as well as online and offline store inventory.


Use recommendation to build long-lasting customer loyalty

recoWe’ve discussed the opportunities and challenges of online recommendation in numerous earlier posts. The current economic climate only heightens the need for retailers to nurture their customer relationship and improve on customer retention.

As previously highlighted, delivering a personalized online experience remains particularly difficult to achieve, because it requires mastering multiple technologies - user segmentation, content targeting, recommendation, website optimization - as well as aggregating data across online marketing channels and overcoming internal resistance. Those are reasons however why personalization remains a key source of competitive advantage, as it keeps customers engaged and helps strengthen customer loyalty.

[Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Apple App Store’s Untapped Potential

December 13th, 2008

Apple has quietly released a few changes to its iPhone App Store on iTunes, in an attempt to alleviate some of the growing pains around its app ecosystem. The App Store has recently hit 10,000 apps and is expected to accept many more.

“Most popular” lists and 19 high-level categories are hardly up to the task of helping consumers find new apps. Limited discovery is hampering the App Store’s growth and monetization and could have a depressing effect on the ecosystem.

There are however quite a few opportunities for Apple to improve discovery and bring the overall shopping experience on the App Store away from simply being a “port” of the iTunes Musicstore:

- Improve discovery through experience

- Enable free trials – free trials are critical to bring feature-rich and higher priced apps to the ecosystem.

- Add videos and user video reviews – text and screenshots do little justice to an app’s capabilities, design, and overall user experience;

- Improve discovery through richer feedback and needs analysis

- Categories and search are limited tools for demand generation;

- Amazon-style recommendations and discovery needs to be more ubiquitous and prominent on the App Store to enable genuine comparison between apps;

- Blending the feedback process about apps much with the user experience on the iPhone could open up a much more personalized experience

- Improve discovery through finer segmentation and filteringthe free vs. paid segmentation is dragging all paid iPhone apps down in the ringtones pricing range; there are only 14 apps over $100 (out of 10,000) and there are still relatively few games at a price comparable to that of a typical game console.

[Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Netflix’s Million Dollar Baby Only Expected the Day After Tomorrow?

December 11th, 2008

For the second year, Netflix has awarded a $50K progress prize. The winning team – BellKor in BigChaos – improved on Netflix’s recommendation algorithm by 9.44%. Although the 10% improvement seems to be getting closer in absolute terms, the last stretch might prove elusive for a little while longer.

Is Netflix’s ground-breaking crowdsourcing approach reaching a limit? Netflix has undeniably got a lot of value out of their contest – 10,000s people working and an algorithmic improvement very close to 10% – for only $100K so far. However, the winning method this year – and the likely research directions for next year – have exponential data and computing power requirements – possibly putting the contest out of reach of most casual researchers.

Are “curated” recommendations superior to pure statistics? Curated recommendations have received some hype lately – from Techmeme’s hiring of an editor to the coincidental launch this week of ClerkDogs – a “clerks-in-a-box” online movie recommendation service? A human touch can certainly rebalance or add a forward-looking perspective to recommendations where data sets are ambiguous (such as clickstream), too small, or lack enough historical data.

[Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Online Holiday Sales Catch Up… But Margins Will Suffer

December 11th, 2008

Deep discounts and free shipping promotions have sparked a catch up in holiday online sales, as exhibited in the chart below. However, remember this holiday season is one week shorter than last year, so holiday sales might well end up coming short overall.

Consumers have been very receptive and sensitive to price – as expected by retailers. For instance, email promotions and comparison shopping have seen quite a boost in effectively driving sales leads to online retailers.

Online retailers have been very aggressive on pricing, which will inevitably drag down margins. The slide show below shows very vividly the messaging focus on price this year, as opposed to last year’s variety of differentiation strategies.

[Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Techmeme’s Human Eye for the Straight Algo

December 4th, 2008

Gabe Rivera of Techmeme fame has sparked a lively debate as he announced he had hired an editor to improve interestingness, reactivity and relevance of his news aggregation website (see VentureBeat, TechCrunch, and ReadWriteWeb). Rivera’s plight echoes Netflix’s challenges at boosting its movie recommendation engine, as algorithmic improvements gradually near their natural asymptote.

Techmeme is good at aggregating news overtime but not at breaking them, pointing to several common datamining and recommendation challenges:

- “Cold start” – interestingly digg’s social voting approach hasn’t been able to overcome that challenge either – in both cases, the services cannot anticipate news’ propagation and velocity;

- Context – Techmeme sometimes mixes up headlines and for instance ended up featuring news about Anna Nicole Smith’s hospitalization after she’s already been declared dead;

- Outliers or the “Napoleon Dynamite” problem, as the New York Times dubs it - identifying newsworthy pieces from uncommon sources before they make it into the mainstream is also an issue.

Interestingness and relevance are Techmeme’s other key reasons to bring in a human eye. Techmeme bets that an expert hand can be a better judge than crowdsourced implicit feedback based on clickstream or explicit feedback such as social voting. This approach seems to contradict much of the crowdsourcing mantra, although Techmeme’s case is more about rebalancing than shunning crowdsourcing.

For online retailers, Techmeme’s move to “curated news aggregation” highlights opportunities to blend human input, datamining, and recommendation:

- to add context to a product recommendation – based on usage, audience background, as well as internal needs through promotions;

- to identify new and unexplored relationships between products – for product discovery, up-sell, and outliers.< >< ><-->

[Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Cyber Monday Update - Clearance Sales Amidst the Holiday Season

December 4th, 2008

ComScore’s numbers are in: Cyber Monday sales grew 15% year over year, making last Monday the second biggest single day on record for ecommerce. However, this performance hides a fair share of rebalancing, as shown by the chart below, as consumers held off on purchases until Monday this year.

The overall mood remains mixed for retailers: consumers’ wallets are thinner and online retailers have to push steep promotions and free shipping to get customers to their sites.

According to ComScore, “more than half (51 percent) of consumers indicated that the level of promotions and discounts is higher this year than last year, while only 12 percent said that there appeared to be fewer, suggesting that retailers are having to be more aggressive in discounting to spur consumer spending.

[Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Will Cyber-Monday Online Sales Hold?

December 1st, 2008

Historically, online sales on cyber Monday have been a good indicator of ecommerce’s year over year growth for the Holiday season.

ComScore reports that online sales for this year’s Black Friday grew a measly 2% year over year. “Early reports suggest that Black Friday sales in retail stores were slightly better than anticipated in this depressed retail climate, and that performance apparently extended to the online channel, which saw sales on Thanksgiving Day and Black Friday combined increase 2 percent versus year ago,” said comScore chairman, Gian Fulgoni. “It’s probable that on Black Friday consumers responded positively to the very aggressive promotions and discounts being offered in retail stores, so it will be important to see how they respond to similarly attractive deals being offered online on Cyber Monday, the traditional kick-off to the online holiday shopping season.

Amazon and eBay reported relatively strong sales, according to Reuters, and “PayPal saw almost 34 percent more transactions this Black Friday than a year earlier, eBay said on Saturday. PayPal saw sales rise 26 percent on Black Friday. PayPal said its sales numbers reflected 12 percent of all U.S. e-commerce.”

These gross revenue numbers reflect a fiercely competitive environment, where retailers have offered deep discounts to attract shoppers both online and offline. This year, extensive discounts and free shipping on Cyber Monday should extend Friday’s modest uptick in sales.

According to a Shopzilla survey, “83.7 percent of retailers will have a special promotion for Cyber Monday, up from 72.2 percent last year. The most popular promotions are expected to be specific deals (38.8%), email campaigns (32.7%), and one-day sales (24.5%). Additionally, nearly one-fourth of retailers (22.5%) will offer free shipping on all purchases.

One additional dynamic possibly at play this year is the sizeable increase of smartphone users with mobile internet access. For the first time, an increase in on-the-spot, comparison shopping between online and brick-and-mortar retailers could have a visible - and detrimental - impact on offline sales.

[Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Music discovery services chart new paths for gift recommendations

November 27th, 2008

Pandora, Last.fm, and iLike have broadened the appeal of recommendation algorithms and social discovery and sharing. Despite a challenging – even hostile - business environment, passionate entrepreneurs and music lovers are bringing to market new ways to explore and discover new music.

Mufin has gathered the most attention so far – being a spin off of the Fraunhofer Institut. Mufin relies exclusively on content analysis to make music recommendations. The service analyzes 40 characteristics for each the 4 million songs in its database, including tempo, sound density, and variety of other factors to filter out songs which are similar. This content-based approach uniquely addresses cold start and long tail discovery issues, but feels a bit too “literal” in the way it analyzes music similarities between songs.

The perceptron is an experimental and transparent collaborative filtering service. The service aggregates and filters recommendations made by actual humans (from tinymixtapes.com and epitonic.com), social links between artists and fans (e.g. belonging to the same label or the number of friends on a myspace page), and other social music sharing sources. Interestingly, recommendations sources and the relative weights of the various sources are all public. The service does a great job at mixing familiar and unknown recommendations, thereby making the new stuff all the more interesting. It would be terrific to see a next generation of this service allow users to actually tinker with sources and weights to obtain more personalized recommendations.

The next big sound pushes the music discovery envelope. The service does a great job at crowd-sourcing and uncovering new musical talents, using the music label paradigm. Each listener is allowed to select and sign up to 10 artists at any given time among all the unsigned artists that broadcast their music on the site. This site is a great place for unadulterated creative talent, although a bit of collaborative filtering would enhance the listening experience.

With Black Friday upon us, we are now entering the Holiday season. Many publications have started churning out their gift recommendation lists – from the top vintage geek gift list to the New York Times’ favorite 100 books for the year to Amazon’s top reviewers’ recommendations for the Holidays.

Wouldn’t it be great to have a service that compiles a personalized gift list, based on deep content analysis between products, expert recommendations, social insight and an Etsy-like indie product-sourcing twist to add a few one-of-a-kind gifts?

There are a few early signs of this future yet to come. Semantic Gifts - currently in alpha - mines your friends’ profiles on twitter, facebook, friendfeed, and their personal blog. Giftag and Amazon’s Universal Wish List now provide a mine of user-generated gift lists. BlackFridayAds and BlackFriday now aggregate black friday coupons and special deals accross thousands of online and brick-and-mortar retailers. If you still can’t find the perfect gift, there’s always Paul McCartney’s self-produced albumElectric Arguments.

[Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Will Kelkoo’s Sale Spur a Turn-Around?

November 21st, 2008

Yahoo! sold Kelkoo today for a mere €100M – a fifth of what it paid in 2004 to acquire it (€475M). Beyond Yahoo’s internal issues and ability to absorb a large entity, a few fundamental issues have plagued Kelkoo and its likes (Shopping.com, PriceGrabber.com, etc.).

Kelkoo and other first-generation price comparison engines have a hard time establishing themselves as mainstream destination sites for online shoppers. Online shoppers are much more likely to start their product search on Google than on any of the price comparison engines.

For quite some time, they managed to get around this issue thanks to their SEO and ad arbitrage expertise. However, Google has worked hard to improve search results and capture an increased share of ad revenue. Search results have increasingly pointed more towards manufacturers and online retailers, while paid search prices has gradually made ad arbitrage prohibitive.

Newcomers, however, are showing possible paths for growth, as online retailers still struggle with product search, discovery and recommendation:

- Twenga is combining the largest product index (over 100 million products) with user reviews and coupons to reach the scale needed for a search, SEO and affiliate-based model to work;

- Like.com is turning online window shopping and visual search into a turn on;

- BlackFriday’s annual surge shows the untapped potential of events, such as Thanksgivings.

[Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Why Invest in Personalization Now?

November 19th, 2008

Today’s statistics about ecommerce show the devastating impact of the financial crisis. Ecommerce websites have been hit hard and revenue growth has ground to a halt.

Tim Walters at Forrester makes a compelling case for advancing personalization efforts in corporate and ecommerce websites, despite the current recession – and inevitable IT budget cuts – in his blogpost and recently published research report.

Delivering a personalized online experience remains particularly difficult to achieve, because it requires mastering multiple technologies - user segmentation, content targeting, recommendation, website optimization - as well as aggregating data across online marketing channels and overcoming internal resistance. Those are reasons however why personalization remains a key source of competitive advantage, as it keeps customers engaged and helps strengthen customer loyalty.

The current ecommerce slowdown will only heighten competition on acquiring new customers and retaining existing customers. Websites that don’t decisively move forward with personalization run the risk of letting the competition outrun them or let emerging third party providers – such as plista – commoditize their content and take over their customer relationship.

[Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Buy.ology’s Smart Tips for Online Marketing and Retail

October 31st, 2008

Buy.ology - Truth and Lies about why we buy

Buy.ology is a captivating read that presents Martin Lindstrom’s foray into neuromarketing – using neuroscience experiments, such as MRI scans, to determine what drives our consumer and shopping habits. Some results are quite thought provoking, such as the fact that consumer warnings on cigarette packs seem to not only fail to deter smoking but even to trigger stimulus responses that encourage smoking!

The book provides some interesting and practical ideas for online marketers:

- Embed your brand in your online experience – in an overly visually stimulated environment, logos and traditional branding have lost some effectiveness. On the other hand, people tend to be much more receptive to brands embedded in the narrative they are trying to sell.

- Generate somatic markers – based on “past memorable experiences of reward and punishment” – are potent decision factors influencing our purchases. A well-known but useful trick to create a long-lasting impression is to bring together two seemingly incompatible elements. The “Will it blend?” videos are an excellent example of that approach, where Tom Dickson from Blendtec tries – and manages – to blend everything, such as an iPhone


- Stimulate “mirror neurons” – mirror neurons are “neurons that fire when an action is being performed and when the same action is being observed”. Watching someone doing something is a powerful invitation to imitate her. Showing videos of users unboxing a product or trying on an outfit they have just received triggers our natural inclination to imitate others. A youtube search for unboxing yields 37K results, such as this example of a buyer unboxing his T-Mobile G1.

[Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Invest in Recommendation, Search, and User-Generated Content to Boost Retail Website

October 3rd, 2008

The State of Retailing Online report for 2008 is an in-depth look at the top online retailers’ priorities and opportunities to strengthen and differentiate their websites.

According to Sucharita Mulpuru, Senior Retail Analyst from Forrester Research, who wrote the report, “online retailers are finding that their best investment efforts are those dedicated to improving the front part of the shopping experience, or the browse features that consumers use before adding items to their shopping cart.

The report ranks investment efforts based on effectiveness and pervasiveness and lets us in on the mechanics of successful retail websites.

Don’t waste time on distracting web and user features

- Wish lists fail to entice users to shop – although it isn’t clear why;

- Website tricks/ bells and whistle, such as flash applications, rollovers, virtual catalogs and streaming video;

- Zooming capabilities are a notable exception and because it directly enhance a product detail page; look to providers like Zoomorama to rapidly become pervasive;

Invest in recommendation, search, and user-generated content to differentiate

- Recommendation technologies seem to offer a strong differentiating potential, with relatively high effectiveness and (still!) relatively low diffusion; another Forrester report drills down on available technologies and vendors;

- Improved search seems like a no-brainer, especially given that online shoppers are very directed in their shopping endeavors;

- Expert and editorial content are a mixed bag – some can be quite effective, especially expert reviews (if available – such as CNET’s syndicated technology reviews)

- User-generated content – consumer ratings and reviews – seems even more effective than expert or editorial content, and still a relatively untapped opportunity for many online retailers. There are many obvious benefits, including user engagement and conversion, loyalty and community building, and SEO. Vendors like Power Reviews have made a big push for pervasiveness and turned customer reviews into a plug and play feature for many websites.

Don’t neglect the bases, like product/offering taxonomy and rich merchandising

- Product and offering taxonomy are important for search and interactive filtering;

- Merchandising – especially a rich product detail page – is critical to convert users, once they’ve set their sights on a particular product.

[Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

When Does Complex Event Processing (CEP) Complement a BRMS?

July 23rd, 2008

I have just published this blogpost on ILOG’s BRMS Blog as guest blogger and I look forward to continuing to explore the opportunities in BRMS and CEP. To digg this post, simply go here.

As interest grows in CEP, we have started receiving inquiries about how CEP and BRMS compete with or complement each other. After discussing with customers, prospects, and vendors, and reviewing a wide range of use cases, a few patterns have emerged.

CEP shines when:

  • event data rates are very high, typically in the 100,000s events per second, and with multiple event streams;
  • latency is low, typically in the millisecond range;
  • flat data model, simple data type;
  • a few stable rules/ statements/ queries (a few dozens at most) are deployed for filtering, joins or aggregate computation.

These core capabilities are well documented. For additional details, Mark Tsimelzon’s CEP Complexity Scorecard summarizes them very effectively.

On the other hand, a BRMS addresses three critical needs:

  1. rich rulesets, typically ranging from a few dozens to tens of thousands of business rules;
  2. a complete lifecycle management environment for business rules,
    empowering technical and business users to author, manage, simulate and
    retire business rules;
  3. extreme agility with the ability to update business rules in as little as a few minutes.

ILOG BRMS does not compromise on performance either, as have shown benchmarks and actual deployments with demanding customers, such assome of the largest websites, payment networks, underwriters, and telecom operators.

Brms_cep

The map sums it up: a CEP engine complements a BRMS for use cases with large data rates, low latency, and rich decision automation and management. The CEP engine pairs down the volume of events and only passes interesting events on to the BRMS to perform a rich decision process. Examples abound, notably in fraud management and national security.

Conversely, CEP overlaps with BRMS at the low end of data rates, latency requirements and rulesets. This is the area where we’ve seen some confusing accounts and claims and where a CEP engine provides limited value on top of a BRMS.

In upcoming posts, we will continue to explore and discuss best practices surrounding BRMS and CEP. We encourage you to reach out to us with related experience and questions.

[Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Wikinvest Launches. Heads for Challenges

October 4th, 2007

Wikinvest

Wikinvest has just raised $2.5M from DCM and officially launched – although it’s been in
open beta for a few months now. In terms of features, on the plus side, the
shared stock chart is a sleek feature and a visual way to share facts and opinions
about stock trends. As far as I can tell, this is a nice differentiator. On the
minus side, the reputation system is interesting from an editorial standpoint,
but fails to enable readers to rate or track a contributor’s opinion (neutral,
bullish or bearish) in light of its past recommendations and successes. Hopefully,
they will fix this weakness, because it significantly reduces the value that
contributors would gain through their work on the wiki.

In terms of funding, $2.5M seems quite a bit of money, considering that Wikinvest currently
lacks technology assets or a user base. As far as content, Wikinvest counts
100,000 contributions. Wired hints that Wikinvest bootstrapped the content with
paid contributors.
With only 250 contributors, so far, we’ll track their growth.
There are only so many free quality contributors for stock analysis. A case in point is the declining state of investor forums.
Moreover, the long tail of investing is overcrowded, but Wikinvest might be able to offer a transition path to some investment newsletters, if they add a monetization path to the site. After all, giving away paid content for free - albeit in a pleasant format - is hardly a business model.

[Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]